Submit for the Taken Apart badge
The rebuilt page, the notes, the write-up, behind one link. Being sent back with notes is a normal outcome.
One link goes in the form. Everything below is what that link has to reach. Pick whichever of them explains the others best, usually the write-up, and make sure a reviewer can get from it to the rest in a click.
The repository: your hand-rebuilt page, both files, with the unstyled markup in its own commit. Include the notes files you accumulated, network-audit.md, cascade-notes.md, the DevTools findings. They are evidence of process, and reviewers read them.
The live URL: deployed, working, and opened on a phone at least once by you before you submit it.
The write-up: published, and linking to the repository and the live page.
And a short note to the reviewer, three or four sentences. What you are least sure about. Where you had to look something up more than twice. Anything you know is not finished. This note changes the review you get: it turns a verdict into a conversation, and a reviewer who knows where you are uncertain will spend their time there rather than on what you already know.
Expect notes back. Being sent back with specific feedback is the normal outcome for a first submission and it is not a failure: the note stays on this page until you submit again, it is the most concentrated teaching in this course, and it only happens because a person actually read your work.
You should now be able to
- Submit a complete, reviewable body of work
- Present your own work so someone else can assess it quickly
Loading…